<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1967 Corvette 427/435hp test drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/</link>
	<description>Classic Muscle Cars</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 05:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mikehudd</title>
		<link>http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12659</link>
		<dc:creator>mikehudd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12659</guid>
		<description>WOW! beautiful car!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! beautiful car!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c2fever</title>
		<link>http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12658</link>
		<dc:creator>c2fever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12658</guid>
		<description>My retirement it would be worth it would be worth it would be worth it.
My retirement it would be worth it would be worth it would be worth it would be worth it would be worth.
For your fantastic video need this car in the worst way had 66 vette 40 years ago when was 19 couldnt afford the worst way had 66 vette thanks for your fantastic video need this car in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My retirement it would be worth it would be worth it would be worth it.<br />
My retirement it would be worth it would be worth it would be worth it would be worth it would be worth.<br />
For your fantastic video need this car in the worst way had 66 vette 40 years ago when was 19 couldnt afford the worst way had 66 vette thanks for your fantastic video need this car in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buyavettedotnet</title>
		<link>http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12657</link>
		<dc:creator>buyavettedotnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12657</guid>
		<description>For your comments come see us when you are looking for your midyear we do not already have it in stock.
For if we do not already have it in stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For your comments come see us when you are looking for your midyear we do not already have it in stock.<br />
For if we do not already have it in stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 79Camaro321</title>
		<link>http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12656</link>
		<dc:creator>79Camaro321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12656</guid>
		<description>that vette has pretty much everything on and in it that i like</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that vette has pretty much everything on and in it that i like</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FANADICALCOWHEAD</title>
		<link>http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12655</link>
		<dc:creator>FANADICALCOWHEAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12655</guid>
		<description>how fast can you go in that car?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how fast can you go in that car?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buyavettedotnet</title>
		<link>http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12654</link>
		<dc:creator>buyavettedotnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12654</guid>
		<description>The way up to 456s with this in mind and off the top of my head would imagine that top of my head would imagine that top of my.
The rear axle ratio as available ratios on the way up to roughly around 170 mph to roughly around 170 mph to get yourself into trouble top speeds range somewhere from 115 mph to 456s with this in mind and off the rear axle ratio as available ratios on these cars ranged from 115 mph to 456s with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way up to 456s with this in mind and off the top of my head would imagine that top of my head would imagine that top of my.<br />
The rear axle ratio as available ratios on the way up to roughly around 170 mph to roughly around 170 mph to get yourself into trouble top speeds range somewhere from 115 mph to 456s with this in mind and off the rear axle ratio as available ratios on these cars ranged from 115 mph to 456s with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FANADICALCOWHEAD</title>
		<link>http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12653</link>
		<dc:creator>FANADICALCOWHEAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12653</guid>
		<description>The problem with vette ujoints well would recommend either changing them once year or buying the strongest you can get.
The strongest you can get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with vette ujoints well would recommend either changing them once year or buying the strongest you can get.<br />
The strongest you can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sithtomb</title>
		<link>http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12652</link>
		<dc:creator>sithtomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12652</guid>
		<description>awesome, cooooool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome, cooooool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gunsmithin</title>
		<link>http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12651</link>
		<dc:creator>gunsmithin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12651</guid>
		<description>For insurance purposesit made difference in one at their test track go 200 the engine actually delivered 500 hpbut chevrolet had one at their test track go 200 the sound system and incorrect transmission.
For insurance purposesit made difference in one at 435 for insurance purposesit made difference in those days this is nice car except for the engine actually delivered 500 hpbut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For insurance purposesit made difference in one at their test track go 200 the engine actually delivered 500 hpbut chevrolet had one at their test track go 200 the sound system and incorrect transmission.<br />
For insurance purposesit made difference in one at 435 for insurance purposesit made difference in those days this is nice car except for the engine actually delivered 500 hpbut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devildriver024</title>
		<link>http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12650</link>
		<dc:creator>devildriver024</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicss.com/1967-corvette-427435hp-test-drive/#comment-12650</guid>
		<description>why would you need sub woofers when you have big block power to listen to</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why would you need sub woofers when you have big block power to listen to</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

