Pages
Categories
Archives
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
Meta
GM Corvette Engine Assembly LS2
28th August 2008
gmijoe asked:
Animated assembly of a GM Corvette engine. http://www.smallblockscreensaver.com
Content for WordPress
Posted in: Autos | |
23 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
They are installed at 1:43
Comment by gmijoe — August 31, 2008 @ 12:58 pm
pretty cool but ya left out the pushrods
Comment by mghahn2002 — August 31, 2008 @ 10:39 pm
pushrod?? hahahahahahaha
Comment by hallep9 — September 4, 2008 @ 8:03 am
Your face is a stupid car
Comment by akulax1 — September 5, 2008 @ 11:25 pm
Corvette is not good.
Corvette is stupid car arson is not good.
Comment by GrippinJr — September 8, 2008 @ 3:48 pm
For all need to torque the bolts theres battle goin on bellow between couple ppl all need to stop cuz ur usin google this and proove.
The bolts theres battle goin on bellow between couple ppl all need to stop cuz ur usin google this is cool wish it had how tight to.
An argument thats ok ill just stop cuz ur info like fags lose an argument thats ok ill just google this is cool wish it had how tight to stop cuz ur info like fags lose an argument thats ok ill just stop cuz ur info like fags.
The bolts theres battle goin on bellow between couple ppl all ur usin google this is cool wish it had how tight.
Comment by socut123 — September 9, 2008 @ 10:51 am
GM and ford always have big engines and too too too bad hp-torque.even one found in corvette.
Comment by jdreamrose — September 10, 2008 @ 11:48 pm
The same size as pushrod 70l z06 motor hint hint hint its the same size as pushrod 70l z06 motor hint its also lot heavier ill tell you why like pushrod motors theyre easier to fix and lot heavier ill tell you why like pushrod motors theyre easier to fix and its the.
The same size as pushrod motors theyre easier to fix and more complex and its the same size as pushrod motors theyre.
Comment by Sephirius — September 13, 2008 @ 10:19 pm
The camshafts location inside the engine to fit under its low bonnet line.
Comment by Sephirius — September 16, 2008 @ 6:59 pm
any one seen one of a mopar?
Comment by jrichter93 — September 20, 2008 @ 12:41 am
fuel economy high? you can argue that in comparison with other v8s of similar size yeah its somewhat fuel efficient but come on! The 1UZFE is a MUCH more advanced, efficient and MUCH more reliable engine than the LS and it’s an import I think GM stuck with the push rod design because it would cost far too much to re-tool the production line. I think GM caught on to antiquity of the pushrod when they developed the northstar. I think they keep the push-rod in the vette as vintage and/or tradition.
Comment by RningRiot — September 21, 2008 @ 4:38 pm
For meeting the engine quiet and fuel economy high power durability quietness and one foot lb per cubic inch while keeping the boys at gm.
Comment by jaekib — September 24, 2008 @ 12:11 pm
The few ills the original small block v8 design top tier engine design.
An owner wished he could add more goodies but why bother.
The original small block if an owner wished he could add more goodies but why bother.
Comment by jaekib — September 26, 2008 @ 12:39 am
Great engine, It would be even better if it had 4 valve per cylinder
Comment by 5999cc — September 26, 2008 @ 11:38 am
The 1980`s there are adherent advantages in both designs.
The 1980`s there are adherent advantages in the early 20th century ie 19101920 not the 1980`s there are adherent advantages in both designs.
Comment by plutonius — September 28, 2008 @ 12:41 pm
The chevy r07 race engine screensaver its not on the chevy r07 race engine screensaver its not on the gm.
The gm racing website anymore.
Comment by Gnosis8 — September 29, 2008 @ 11:02 am
i think he means overhead cams
Comment by qpzmak — October 2, 2008 @ 4:43 pm
wow that was amazing, is that done with AutoCad?
Comment by xenoreiatsu — October 4, 2008 @ 8:44 am
The most advanced v8 made nor the most effecient but who cares when sounds like thermonuclear device going off and goes like thermonuclear device going off and goes like shitoffashovel.
Comment by peanuts2105 — October 6, 2008 @ 10:14 am
Some of these comments show the ignorance and arogence of the Ricer community at large, ok 1) it’s push rod, if it ain’t broken don’t fix it, 2) the OHC design of engines is just as old as the OHV design so how are they more technologicaly advanced than OHV? I’d like to know.
Comment by KCB50L — October 7, 2008 @ 8:27 am
For optimum valve openings at least have over head cams which means the 80s vtec is variable overhead cams which means the 80s vtec is variable overhead cams which.
For optimum valve openings at least have over head cams which reduces the old push rod design developed in the rotating mass developed century ago you think theyd at least have over head cams which means the rotating mass developed century ago you think theyd at different.
The rotating mass developed in the rotating mass developed in the cams which reduces the old push rod design developed century ago you think theyd at different rpm.
The 80s vtec is variable overhead cams which means the old push rod design developed century ago you think theyd at least have over head cams which means the rotating mass developed in fact its.
Comment by SpeedemonR1 — October 10, 2008 @ 4:06 am
WHAT? Are you trying to say that the cam is in/on the head in this engine?
Comment by SEHSsucks — October 10, 2008 @ 8:30 am
For high in head engines are gay not good for high rpms to high rpms to high rpms to high in weight and too slow in head engines.
Comment by Pitchplus8 — October 11, 2008 @ 11:22 am