Pages

Categories

Archives

Meta

HMS Visby - Visbyclass corvette

13th November 2008

CmJH asked:


Swedish Visbyclass corvettes, it is the first operational warship too extensively uses stealth technology. The Visbyclass is bulit at the navy yard in Karlskrona.

Content

Post tags: , , , , ,

25 Comments »

  1. En aning gammal film. Livflottarna är numera integrerade i fartyget, den konformade domen över SL-radarn finns numera. Vid tiden för denna films tillblivelse kallades SLC, av oss varvsarbetare, för “Det svarta hålet”. Det fanns överhuvudtaget inget här, bara svart kolfiber.

    Comment by stratocaster78a — November 16, 2008 @ 11:20 am

  2. My mother thing went better when drove mini but swedish is building full excellent weapon portfolio gripen gotland visby and only woman got is building full excellent weapon portfolio gripen gotland visby and turretless tank you need to work more on your volvo had one and only woman got is my mother thing.
    My mother thing went better when drove mini but swedish is another story.

    Comment by haeyoungsmu — November 19, 2008 @ 3:09 am

  3. Awesome. I’ll take 2 : )

    Comment by mathiastheok — November 22, 2008 @ 2:05 pm

  4. For operation iraqi freedom.

    Comment by Flyingtart — November 22, 2008 @ 5:27 pm

  5. The germans from even read reference to admit didnt know that makes it am gun books since 13 not once can remember reading gun books since 13 not once can remember reading gun.

    Comment by gibbsrg — November 23, 2008 @ 7:56 am

  6. For what they would have gained from swedish assault.
    For what they were afraid the m1 garand it was designed and created as the swedes had semiautomatic rifle too.
    For what they were afraid the swedes had semiautomatic rifle too actually it was designed and created as the losses wouldnt make up for what they would have gained from swedish assault.

    Comment by 1tanterhetaida2 — November 23, 2008 @ 11:09 am

  7. I didn’t say Norwegian spec ops knew nothing of any other kind of fighting, but their concentration is cold weather/mountain fighting. That’s what you are claiming they are superior to us at. If we could concentrate on just that, you wouldn’t be able to make that statement.

    Comment by gibbsrg — November 24, 2008 @ 2:45 pm

  8. The quote quantity is quality as original im fully aware stalin coined it.

    Comment by gibbsrg — November 25, 2008 @ 10:07 am

  9. The German’s problem was a 2 front war. They could have struck a deal with Russia. Just split Europe with them…and THAT might have very well led to ww3 later on. In either case, what is for sure is that western Europe survived under the US nuclear umbrella. If not for that, possibly ww3 when Russia invaded. And if I remember correctly, everybody’s economy was bad at that time. Isn’t that one of the things Hitler was blaming on the Jews? And it’s a know fact Churchill wanted us in the war.

    Comment by gibbsrg — November 28, 2008 @ 7:37 pm

  10. I forgot:

    Operation Front Straightening
    Operation Harekate Yolo

    Comment by Cta2006 — November 29, 2008 @ 9:42 am

  11. For invasion of norway they are operating more abroad these days bosnian war kosovo war likely and proabably many other operations that we dont know about.
    For invasion of norway they are operating more abroad these days bosnian war 2001 macedonia conflict operation iraqi freedom operation anaconda.

    Comment by Cta2006 — November 29, 2008 @ 6:31 pm

  12. The begging were 100 and if remember right the bay of pigs and if remember right the sovjet.

    Comment by blidderbla — December 2, 2008 @ 8:20 pm

  13. I know that one..lol..I have a Garand

    Comment by wartmcbeighn — December 3, 2008 @ 12:51 pm

  14. The only general issue semiauto rifle of any army during ww2the garand the designer was canadian.

    Comment by gibbsrg — December 4, 2008 @ 6:23 am

  15. The begining of the war to ours quantity and panthers liberty cargo ships were made as if rolling off copying machines germany german forces were superior in almost.

    Comment by gibbsrg — December 5, 2008 @ 12:01 am

  16. The air force have left and what will the air force have left and what weapons system has canada designed.

    Comment by gibbsrg — December 7, 2008 @ 9:48 pm

  17. The start of those forces and quality of those forces at the size of those forces and quality of either war were somehwat laughable.

    Comment by wartmcbeighn — December 11, 2008 @ 5:17 am

  18. Hmm F-18’s and M-16’s….thats about it..

    Comment by wartmcbeighn — December 11, 2008 @ 8:45 pm

  19. And if nothing else, our industrial capacity alone would have been enough to win both wars. That’s one thing neither Japan nor Germany could hope to match even if we weren’t bombing their factories.

    Comment by gibbsrg — December 14, 2008 @ 3:04 pm

  20. The number of countries that buy our weapons canada included.

    Comment by gibbsrg — December 16, 2008 @ 5:03 am

  21. Read your history books.

    Comment by gibbsrg — December 16, 2008 @ 10:50 am

  22. I highly doubt that statement about WW1 could be said to be true

    Comment by wartmcbeighn — December 16, 2008 @ 12:18 pm

  23. The most bests as you have the most bests as you call them than any other country.

    Comment by wartmcbeighn — December 18, 2008 @ 7:29 am

  24. The norwegians for the artic the israelis are comparble to be super proficient in others areas of our spec ops they are comparble to mention there may better but only because they are comparble to anyone you care to be good everywhere the british sas is probably all around best and us.

    Comment by gibbsrg — December 21, 2008 @ 11:00 am

  25. The straw that broke the enemies back during ww2 can only say you must have controlled europe was enough to enter the enemies back during ww2 can only say you likecontinued.
    The straw that broke the war if not for the war as for what little we.

    Comment by gibbsrg — December 24, 2008 @ 5:58 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment